The idea of walking distance

13 Aug

I really like Around the Horn. I like the banter, I like the intelligence of the arguments, even if they are presented as sound bites.

The show’s producer, Aaron Soloman, host, Tony Reali, and staff do a great job of sharing behind the scenes odds and ends on YouTube.

On Wednesday, they posted a video riffing off of ex-Clippers owner Shelly Stirling’s perks. Stirling is getting a fan’s golden parachutes as she and her estranged husband take leave of their team.

The chatter? About media perks and what is most important.

It’s all about being able to park. Only at the end does Bob Ryan make even a mention of the what should be the easiest solution to their problem – not having to park at all. But of course, when it comes to football stadiums especially, that’s often not an option.

That we’ve landed in such a spot, that makes me sad.

Norm Macdonald’s amazing story about Robin Williams

12 Aug

For those of you not on Twitter: Norm Macdonald is pretty excellent at the medium.

We all know how funny he is. His wit, his ability to set up even the simplest of lines, is among comedy’s best. He’s aware of his skill and shares ideas and concepts in a way that demands much of his audience but makes it easy on them at the same time.

You listen, you anticipate, you melt with laughter.

He also knows how to make a point. On Twitter on Monday night, the Canadian comic shared a story about the man Russell Brand described as “a geyser of comedy.” (Seriously, if you’ve missed Brand’s piece for The Guardian on Williams – go read it next. It’s remarkable.)

It’s a series of tweets, which I’ll link below:

Thanks, Norm. Hugs to you all.

Brendan Shanahan, Kyle Dubas and a fear of change

28 Jul

Fluto Shinzawa wrote a really great piece for The Boston Globe this weekend, called Toronto president Brendan Shanahan a forward thinker. I’m going to let it stand for itself (that’s why I’m posting it here) and not write much on it.

This is why teams repeat mistakes at the draft table, in trades, and on the free market. There are too many people who think about hockey the same way and don’t challenge each other to see the game differently.

There are no women. There aren’t many people of color. There are few who’ve worked in different sports, to say nothing of other industries. There are even fewer who haven’t played in the NHL. On-ice experience is just about a requirement for clubhouse entry.

This is nonsense.

Is the big key. It’s 100 per cent true. It’s something that baseball finally sorted out in the last decade. Soccer and rugby have examples of ‘trying something different’ in their recent pasts. Will hockey be next? If Shanahan and Dubas are successful – maybe.

Anyway, give it a read.

A very, very interesting concept from Pittsburgh sports writer Dejan Kovacevic

21 Jul

Dejan Kovacevic, one of Pittsburgh’s most trusted names in sports journalism, is taking his personal brand in a new direction: he’s detaching himself from the Steel City’s legacy news outlets and starting up his own site.

As reported by the Pittsburgh Business Times, Kovacevic, who’s accumulated 55,000 Twitter followers, is convinced that the following he’s built over the years, writing for both the Post-Gazette and the Tribune Review, will go with him to his new site.

“I believe in the readership that I have,” said Kovacevic. “They’d followed me once from the PG over to the Trib. And I believe that there’s enough of a connection there that the more diehard Pittsburgh sports fan will follow again to this platform.”

The key here is that he’s going to charge a subscription rate, running between $1.50 and $4 a month, depending on how long a subscriber signs on for. He’s taking a huge gamble, hoping that the people who’ve come to know his work – many of whom were likely getting his work for free – will now be willing to fork over a small sum to keep it going.  (He’s also going to sell ads, but there’s still so little money in those that his subscriptions will have to pay the bills in the short term.)

But like many, he’s going with the metered paywall model, allowing readers to access up to 10 articles per month. Depending how much he files, that could be as much as a third of his monthly output. Most beat reporters these days write 1 or 2 stories per day, five days a week, so Kovacevic’s plan to write 3 or 4 columns per week plus bits and pieces seems a little light but he’s clearly putting his money where his mouth his, believing that what he has to say is much more important than how often he says it.d

Speaking from a web-traffic point of view, he’s got a chance. Given how many page views he’s suggested (in the millions, which seems accurate), he’s not unlike several of my colleagues here at the Province, who we’ve learned drive traffic as much by their name as they do by their stories. There are a couple easy traffic-driving tick-boxes for us: one is name, the other is team. A Canucks story will always do best. Lions and Whitecaps are well beneath the hockey team, even in the dead of summer, while everything else lies far beneath. Every once in a while a compelling story with a good headline grabs our readers’ attention, but it’s the authors, on the whole, who drive traffic.

This is a project worth watching.

A quick thought on this “Day of Honour”

9 May

Reading the Globe and Mail this morning – yes I still get it delivered – I found myself contemplated a full-page ad for Lockheed Martin.

LM, in case you missed it, is one of the world’s biggest arms manufacturers.

“Today we join all Canadians in the recognition of the strength and courage of our Canadian Armed Forces and the families of the fallen who sacrificed so much in the pursuit of peace and stability in Afghansitan,” the message reads.

Is that what the campaign was about, in the end? At some point it was about regime change. Then it had something to do with eliminating the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. Then it was about securing Kandahar in general.

It was in “pursuit” – which is a fine way to say, “well, that didn’t really work.”

Hardly as noble as the purpose of the Second World War; or for the muddled peacekeeping period.

There was a notion for a time of nation building, that at the end of all of NATO’s efforts in Afghanistan, a new, thriving nation would exist. It’s fair to say that’s not the case. Afghanistan is a mess. For much of its history its been a mess. There was something of a golden age in the 60s and 70s, before the Soviet intervention began a 30-plus year period of chaos, full of foreign meddling, but even that was far from a dream period.

We are left asking – what was the point? Was the Taliban removed from power? Yes. That’s a good thing. Was Al-Qaeda fundamentally altered in its behaviour? Sort of. Its power structure was radically altered but extremists of their ilk continue to exist the world over. They’ve mostly been displaced.

Are Afghans better off now than they were in 2001? Sort of. As it stands, women aren’t faced with draonian laws. But there are plenty of examples where women’s rights are a joke.

So why did 158 Canadians lose their lives? We live in a world where working for what’s right is never easy. Canada’s motivation was mostly virtuous. The execution of that virtue is debatable, but the spirit was there.

***

Back to that original statement, the “peace and stability in Afghanistan” angle. I’ve not been there, I’m only going off reports, but is Afghanistan more peaceful than it was before Operation Enduring Freedom? It doesn’t sound like. Is it more stable? Well, there’s a national government but there are still plenty of ethnic divisions. There’s certainly more infrastructure than there was – but how long will it stay in good repair? How long until corruption destroys all the good work?

You can’t assess decisions by their results – you can only assess them by their process. The original move to join the US-lead invasion by the Chretien government was the right one. I agreed with it at the time. I agree with it now. It’s what came after that I always questioned. It’s awfully hard to argue that guns could deliver peace – and make no mistake about it, that was the approach here.

Maybe there was no choice. Security had to be established. The only way to do that was to use the finest fighting forces available; that wasn’t really a choice, given all the weapons the Taliban and Al-Qaeda were hoarding. It was either the repression of everyone by extremists or having those same extremists take pot shots at NATO soldiers.

What an ugly choice.

***

Is the nation further along? Again, look at that pairing. I suppose it is. But the cost was heavy. Maybe we should talking about how hard this all is, and remember our dead for that.

Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto denies any involvement with Bitcoin

17 Mar

According to a letter his lawyer sent to Reuters’ Felix Salmon, anyway…

The plot thickens…

(In case you missed it, Newsweek made a bit splash almost two weeks ago when they featured Mr. Nakamoto in their cover story, alleging he was the creator of the original source code for the online crypto-currency Bitcoin.)

Yup, I was on CBC Radio’s On the Coast

14 Mar

Yup, that’s my pal Dimitri Filipovic from Canucks Army and I talking about the Canucks debacle…

Listen here on CBC On The Coast’s website

When silence is good: my year

31 Dec

What a year, friends. I’ve not written in this space not because I’ve been uninspired, but because, as so many of you know, I’ve been so damn busy!

That’s what happens when you land the job of your dreams. I’m six months in – with six months to go on the current contract – and I’m happy where I’ve landed.

I’ve got fantastic colleagues. We have struggles with our equipment, struggles with corporate issues, but through it all, the people are amazing. Every day we come to work, and every day we pump story after story after story out. Some are mundane but many are not. Seeing us operate the magnifying glass and revealing society to itself has to be the most fascinating thing I’ve ever witnessed.

I like being a teacher. I love being a journalist.

So, a few moments of thanks, looking back at a year which started with frustration but ended with plenty of joy.

Thanks to everyone who believed in me as the year opened – my friends and family who knew what I could be and encouraged me to keep fighting forward, even as the struggle seemed too high a mountain. I took a crazy path to my current job, but I got there and it’s the belief others showed in me that powered me there.

Thanks to everyone who read my stories, be they hockey fans, rugby fans, politicos and otherwise. The feedback tells me that people care. That’s why I do it. Because you all care, because you all want to know.

Thanks to everyone who pushed me to be better, who knew that I was capable of so much more, that each step mattered and that I shouldn’t fear taking those steps.

Thanks to all the people I’ve interviewed in the past year – most of you don’t know who I am, but some do – you are all fascinating and each of you has taught me something about my practice. I’m still learning how to be a journalist (will I ever stop? I doubt it…) and each question, each answer, shows me something new.

Thanks to all of you who engage with my chatter, whether it’s legitimate or not. I love to spar with words and I love to hear what other people have to say. It helps me sort out all the wild ideas that race through my mind at all hours of the day.

Thanks to the players who showed up to my practices. I love coaching and I love seeing young athletes succeed. Ask a a coach why they do it – it’s always because of the players.

Thanks to the random students I’ve encountered. I’ve learned so much from you, about what growing up is like, about how our society works, about what questions people ask, about why people are how they are as adults.

Thanks to everyone I love and to everyone who loves me back. It’s way more fun striving to make the world a better place, no matter how risky that might be, than it is to cover ourselves up and hide. Fear sucks; love doesn’t.

Have a great 2014 everyone.

BC Election aftermath: the things that scare me

14 May

Beyond the ‘who won, who lost’ aspect – three things that scare the crap out of me in the wake of the election – these go beyond party lines.

48 per cent voter turnout

That’s shocking. Voters have been so turned off by government that most of them stayed home. They don’t feel the impact of politics, they don’t like the rhetoric, whatever it is, our system is broken. People don’t care. Maybe that’s not really an issue, that our modern age is so straightforward that it doesn’t matter, but there are so many things around the edges. Those things around the edges are what end having huge impacts on our lives.

You can do all the math you want on how many British Columbians *actually* voted for Christy Clark, but the problem is deeper than that.

*Update (1:50 p.m.) – since the first numbers were reported last night, Elections BC has upped their turnout estimate to about 52 percent, a touch above 2009’s turnout. That’s still worst in the country.

Climate change.

Other than the Greens, no party truly talked about it. Both the NDP and the BC Liberals paid lip service to the environment, effectively seeking to frame it under short-sighted ‘business as usual’ rhetoric. Not once did oil itself enter into the discussion. There was no question that it will continue to flow and that our energy needs will continue to be powered by the black stuff. It was all made more ugly given our passing the global 400 ppm barrier last week.

‘Resources! Resources! Resources!’ has been the cry, to varying degrees, meanwhile the world is already burning up and Richmond will be under water before we know it. Sticking our heads in the sand won’t cut it anymore. Life needs to change; it’s going to change one way or another.

Transit.

Clark’s victory speech mentioned hospitals, schools and roads.

A significant portion of the Lower Mainland travels in other ways and many of those people are BC Liberal voters. I live in a community that is already overwhelmed by traffic. There are clear transit needs – not just ‘solutions’ – right in front of me and that’s not going to happen. (Also, see item 2.)

I hope I’m wrong about this stuff and that our premier does what she says she’ll do – lead. That means taking the bull by the horn and getting the right thing done. In her campaign, she spent a lot of time talking about what British Columbians care about; I hope she’s really been listening.

The amazing impact of a false tweet about Barack Obama

23 Apr

enhanced-buzz-931-1366737748-18

That’s a momentary drop of 100 points in the Dow average, all because of a tweet from the main Associated Press twitter account that said there’d been two explosions at the White House and that the President was injured.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,578 other followers